{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6519","body_sha256":"c7b6a6305deb199125db8db063e4dd9f9c20dd14bbcd96ed4507548e30a1ff90","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"Commission an independent, comprehensive review"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"Reassess whether current exposure limits"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"no clear increase in some cancers"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"RF exposure and male fertility"},{"id":"children","evidence":"particular attention to children, pregnancy"}],"summary":"The commenter calls for independent evidence review, updated limits, long-term research, and public reporting. They discuss cancer and reproductive findings alongside studies showing no clear effects and explicitly distinguish biological findings from proof of disease from everyday wireless exposure.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"e549198f052def11b98bbdbb39246a65fbca10893826be76d3328776d62000c9","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}