{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6462","body_sha256":"2590462aaffa56b449f1cf1a1a6b65597b99ec023f73f2a037cf39cde772c828","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"Question 18:  \n\nRE:  Neurotoxicity:  \n\nThe current limits on EMF/GSM-like RF exposure on the human population must be re-e"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":"Question 18:  \n\nRE:  Neurotoxicity:  \n\nThe current limits on EMF/GSM-like RF exposure on the human "},{"id":"research","evidence":"ect the human population. We need to conduct specific research on the true effects of radiation on humans, animals, and any liv"},{"id":"children","evidence":"h AirPods, 5G, and emerging 6G technologies. Children are reportedly especially vulnerable in that they absorb higher "},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"cessary to institute truly safe limits.\n\nRE: cell phone towers\n\nBalmori, A. (2022). Evidence for a health risk by RF on humans "}],"summary":"The commenter requests stricter exposure limits and research on neurotoxicity, cites laboratory and tower-related studies, and emphasizes children's susceptibility.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"9a5448cf126fc947c9172f17a6484b7c69c82de59d81f0a6f6b9842dd1d1a8b0","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}