{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6454","body_sha256":"0dbc6199d542debeeb830124cdc329b6068099bb03991ecade9db2756a392494","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":" and other sources.  \n\nThe U.S. government’s safety limits have not kept up with Americans' use and exposure to technology."},{"id":"smart-meters","evidence":"ow consumers to “opt out” of their wireless “smart” meters.  Having a wireless-free home isn’t always enough either"},{"id":"electricity","evidence":"e EMF emissions are increasing as new 765 kV high-voltage transmission lines have been proposed for AI data centers and wireless infrastructu"},{"id":"access","evidence":" etc.) has been installed near their homes.  Not everyone can afford to shield their homes or move to a safer location.  \n\nWe also re"},{"id":"research","evidence":"eview.  Thank you for your consideration.  \n\nStudies of radiofrequency (RF) radiation have reported:\nIncreased cancer risk  https://www"}],"summary":"An Ohio advocate describes reported health effects and limited options for affected residents, requests urgent federal action on exposure standards, and supplies research references spanning wireless and power-line concerns.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"946379100630fa6bace93baef50f5c4df60e3e20655d6217a77eebc76ebdb760","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}