{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-6352","body_sha256":"fa58eef0e7e1345c8f79f977521c8185031cdd7ab61e4cf57ba8cdf64035c0d2","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"infrastructure","topics":[{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"failed to fulfill requirements for approving cell tower placement, including the review required before placing a cell tower in a "},{"id":"standards","evidence":" clearly to the need for a serious review of safety standards, and which also highlighted the negative effects on insects (inc"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"ich also highlighted the negative effects on insects (including pollinators) and migrating birds with regard to navigation and orientation. T"}],"summary":"The commenter raises concerns about tower permitting and historic-district review, restrictions on considering health in siting, and possible ecological effects, and calls for review of safety standards.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T23:54:32Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"7460a1e6ea11a1430fcc20e212ae34c6568e69a2389a8f7ca5cfc48ad2290139","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}