{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5818","number":"5818","name":"Shary Nunan","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-28T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-19T04:00Z","body":"Independent research (not funded by telecommunications companies) has shown a clear link between RF radiation and serious health issues in children, adults and flora/fauna. The HHS should follow the guidelines of BioInitiative Report 2012 unless clear scientific evidence shows that a different level of rf exposure is safe. Below are the links to research documenting the need for stronger limits on rf exposure:\nExposure limits to radiofrequency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental animals | Environmental Health | Springer Nature Link\nScientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G | Environmental Health | Springer Nature Link\nCellular and molecular effects of non-ionizing electromag...\nThe roles of intensity, exposure duration, and modulation on the biological effects of radiofrequency radiation and exposure guidelines: Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine: Vol 41 , No 2 - Get Access\nGenetic effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields: Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine: Vol 40 , No 2 - Get Access\n\n\n","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5818","tags":["cancer-tumors","child-development","biology-metabolism","exposure-places","policy-standards","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"4a5cfbe23007ca55cd3f3ceee143be9ed7813ba020e510ddc5ba427c7ac22460","slug":"cancer-tumors-comment-5818","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5818","body_sha256":"797f93abe7bf3b272cc710d8c0a2c49066b1362ecbdfb6d061426be47c5694f2","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":" level of rf exposure is safe. Below are the links to research documenting the need for stronger limits on rf exposure:\nExposur"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"e links to research documenting the need for stronger limits on rf exposure:\nExposure limits to radiofrequency EMF do not acc"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"its to radiofrequency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental anim"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"quency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental animals | Environmental Healt"}],"summary":"The commenter cites research concerning biological effects and urges HHS to adopt BioInitiative recommendations and stronger RF exposure limits.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T16:50:58Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"90df29807d8e8c83ea0b9aa9380bff547daf72040066b241f84730301576597d","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["research","standards","cancer","reproductive"],"primary_topic":"research","forum_title":"The commenter cites research concerning biological effects and urges HHS to adopt BioInitiative recommend…"}