{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5818","body_sha256":"797f93abe7bf3b272cc710d8c0a2c49066b1362ecbdfb6d061426be47c5694f2","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":" level of rf exposure is safe. Below are the links to research documenting the need for stronger limits on rf exposure:\nExposur"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"e links to research documenting the need for stronger limits on rf exposure:\nExposure limits to radiofrequency EMF do not acc"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"its to radiofrequency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental anim"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"quency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental animals | Environmental Healt"}],"summary":"The commenter cites research concerning biological effects and urges HHS to adopt BioInitiative recommendations and stronger RF exposure limits.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T16:50:58Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"90df29807d8e8c83ea0b9aa9380bff547daf72040066b241f84730301576597d","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}