{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5632","body_sha256":"bf5631be246903ad963250056ca6018523a4fce5606a407cd0bcbe9953dfe6b7","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"that TRILLION DOLLARS now?\n\nI implore you to update safety standards NOW, using third party testing, NOT funded by the wireless industry."},{"id":"research","evidence":"re you to update safety standards NOW, using third party testing, NOT funded by the wireless industry. \n\nSincerely, \n\nJeannie Fer"},{"id":"optical","evidence":"he money already paid by their customers for fiber optic to the premises into wireless technology instead. Where is that TRILLION DOLLARS"},{"id":"privacy","evidence":"ion programs and services, with no threat to cyber security because it can't be hacked and it poses no health risk to humans"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"d that wireless radiation raised the risk of brain tumors. Those 1996 safety standards only considered the thermal effects"}],"summary":"Criticizes FCC oversight and industry influence, calls for updated independently tested safety standards, and advocates fiber-to-premises broadband.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"2037dbe57b6ef9ee5407a18665f0faa2963c45c792ce4d4bb1826b0a0adeefea","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}