{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5499","body_sha256":"4488685268c85ed1b26e720d5f99de7e2f45e49a18fdd6950131be25c56d400c","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"cancer","topics":[{"id":"cancer","evidence":"cy Radiation (RFR) should be recognized as a human carcinogen.\nLimit human exposure to low levels, for example 1μW/cm2 average"},{"id":"occupational","evidence":"er patients previously exposed to RFR in the military and occupational setting.\n\nThe exposure:\nThe exposure was from radio communication transm"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"it human exposure to low levels, for example 1μW/cm2 average level and 5μW/cm2 peak pulse level. The suggested level is in the range of known community levels. "},{"id":"research","evidence":"cancer and for other health effects.\nPerform epidemiological cancer research on all known personnel exposed to significant levels of RFR.\nPle"}],"summary":"Researchers summarize occupational and military cancer findings, recommend recognizing RF as a human carcinogen, and call for lower average and peak exposures, monitoring and further epidemiology.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T23:26:06Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"e8c796b4fd1bdc4ed92431a6898c13ada522a2f7fe8afef128bae986cd6a9206","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}