{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5243","body_sha256":"ec2efbff6748746c792ab158c09fb7845f6e845b3bc0866809b52ec854893aaf","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"This link is extremely informative regarding industry influence in the \"science\" that's used to gaslight the public about safety"},{"id":"standards","evidence":" only ionizing radiation is capable of harm, limits are set based on thermal heating that ignore the many ways cellular processes are disrupted by no"},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"any ways cellular processes are disrupted by non-thermal exposure. This is wrong. It is scientifically, and morally, obviously, wr"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"frequency Radiation: Implications for 5G\nThe Carcinogenic Potential of non-Ionizing Radiation\n\nIf by some miracle this reaches anyon"}],"summary":"The commenter argues that industry influence distorts wireless safety research and exposure standards, challenges thermal-only limits, and submits studies concerning biological effects and carcinogenic potential while requesting public protection.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-27T19:20:49Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"2f4e8c3980ddc40e586d05d861ce20975f09d9b27dc4158fe7fea8e82b089bf0","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}