{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5078","body_sha256":"652dfa439e2dc422e668f9bcbe57be9f6113d8f17d80276dc37c97da2c7184fd","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"(and our health) by failing to adhere to the Precautionary Principle.  Industry has been allowed to proceed without providing evidenc"},{"id":"research","evidence":"on that the court found missing, I ask for a federal evidence review that holds agencies and industry to the Precautionary Principle."},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"\nZhao L, et al. Magnetic fields exposure and childhood leukemia risk: a meta-analysis based on 11,699 cases and 13,194 controls."},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"lds of high voltage overhead power lines and female infertility. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2019. Residence within 500 m: adjusted"},{"id":"electricity","evidence":"et al. Exposure to electromagnetic fields of high voltage overhead power lines and female infertility. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2019. Residence"},{"id":"occupational","evidence":"Zendehdel R, et al. DNA effects of low level occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (50/60 Hz). To"}],"summary":"A retired physician urges precautionary federal review, cites studies on cancer and other health effects, and argues that evidence for newer technologies remains inadequate for safety assessment.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-26T22:22:05Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"400154b5f25438795f21ef7758a646d3623366e7b5a0e79678b97ce6eee2812e","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}