{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5056","body_sha256":"53b777e8f717564a2517f8198ec1b44bc3b3719d16656f38bf23d7d6c03d2980","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":" ask HHS and the FCC to conduct transparent,\nindependent assessments of radiofrequency exposure that consider children, long-term and"},{"id":"children","evidence":" assessments of radiofrequency exposure that consider children, long-term and repeated\nexposure, and realistic conditions of de"},{"id":"standards","evidence":" and conflicting results.\n2. Explain whether current exposure limits and compliance testing adequately address children, long-term\nus"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":" and colleagues (2025) reviewed experimental animal cancer studies and reported high-certainty\nevidence for increased glioma and ma"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":" on developmental and neurological outcomes, reproductive\nhealth, and cumulative exposure, with transparent funding and co"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":", reproducible research on developmental and neurological outcomes, reproductive\nhealth, and cumulative exposure, with transparent "}],"summary":"Requests transparent assessment of wireless health evidence, distinguishing animal findings from human risk, and research and guidance addressing children, long-term use and current exposure limits.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-26T22:22:05Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"030aac2d1f7dd1b5b33dbb3807dce59aaa542455ab34ddd5e048683d3cef891e","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}