HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4968
https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4968

A Detailed analysis of hundreds of EMF studies with recommendations and current state of research with suggested paths forward for better understanding and exploration:

Executive Overview:
Many questions remain unanswered related to Non-Native EMF (nnEMF) and the biological effects that result from exposure. The USA is the sickest it has been in decades. Photos of people on US beaches in the 1970s compared to 2020s shows a drastic difference. Obesity is prevalent. Early research indicates health impacts are coming food sources and other aspects of the standard American lifestyle, however not all are being given the same level of review. nnEMF is one of the areas of research that has been neglected.
Some research exists but is by no means comprehensive. Established studies show that heat from high-power radiofrequency energy is real, and Federal exposure limits exist because of it.
Across whole populations, the best pooled studies show no overall rise in brain cancer as phone use became nearly universal, however the benchmark of testing positive for having brain cancer, or any cancer should not be the benchmark for a negative health impact.
nnEMF has become so ubiquitous that it makes study challenging due to every day exposure, but this does not mean the research is not essential. Leaded gasoline was another universal exposure that was later deemed to be dangerous and phased out. Wi-Fi, 5G and other cellphone bands, Electric Vehicles, Home appliances with AC currents, bluetooth, are sources of exposure every day. If discoveries are made that these devices do impact human biology in a substantive manner, then considerations around how hospitals and healthcare institutions adopt and utilize these technologies in the patient journey should also be considered.
A 1% or 5% or 10% impact on overall longevity (aging sooner) with impacts to memory, behavior, IQ, fertility, that may go unseen because cancer does not present would still be a major revelation.
The net impact from a 5% increase in adult working years would have a massive benefit to US GDP, strengthening national security and economic security. Healthy people create less economic drag for tax payers as they age.
The field of biological nnEMF impacts deserves to be studied in pursuit of the MAHA goals of overall wellness improvements for Americans.
Studies indicate that nnEMF research has not yet been explored to completion. First, the National Toxicology Program, a research program, found "clear evidence" of a rare malignant heart tumor in male rats exposed to high whole-body levels of 2G/3G-type radiation. A 2025 review commissioned for the World Health Organization rated the animal evidence high certainty for that heart tumor and for malignant gliomas, while warning that moving from animal tumor results to human risk is unusually difficult.
Second, and separately, a 2016 count found oxidative-stress effects reported in 93 of 100 low-intensity studies, but the 2024 WHO-commissioned systematic review rated the oxidative-stress literature very-low certainty: most of the studies were small and at high risk of bias. And no cohort has yet followed heavy phone users from a young start through a full adult lifetime. Three conclusions match the evidence: everyday exposure is low, a health effect at ordinary levels has not been established, and the missing studies are worth doing.