{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4552","number":"4552","name":"Anonymous Anonymous","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-26T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-16T04:00Z","body":"Thank you for the opportunity to submit a comment.  I absolutely oppose the 2-way wireless radiation emitting smart meters and digital meters that have been forced on Americans’ homes, including mine. \n\n \n\nAdditionally I am very concerned about increasing levels of other sources of electromagnetic radiation and how exposure will affect all Americans, especially my family, as well as the enviroment. \n\n \n\nOver 1,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies have demonstrated serious adverse health effects from the wireless radiation coming from our cell phones, cell towers, and \"Smart\" meters radiating our homes 24/7.  This includes DNA damage, infertility and reproductive damage, cardiac effects and arrest, neurological conditions (anxiety, depression, Alzheimers), immune system dysfunction, and cancer.\n\n \n\nEnvironmental Health Trust provides a list of scientific evidence on this webpage that I am including with my submission. \n\nhttps://ehtrust.org/send-science-to-the-fcc-govt-is-asking-for-evidence-you-can-help-now/\n\n \n\nThe FCC was sued in 2021 for failing to update their safety guidelines for human exposure limits that were established in 1996 when we were using 2G wireless technologies, not the 4G and 5G we have today.  The lawsuit was successful, but now over 5 years later the FCC still has not responded to the court and is refusing to regulate the Telecoms.  The reality is NO ONE is measuring our cumulative daily human exposure of EMF “electrosmog” coming from all of our current sources of wireless radiation including 4G/5G “mega” towers, 5G small cells, and the EMF pulsing Smart meters attached to our homes.  https://ehtrust.org/in-historic-decision-federal-court-finds-fcc-failed-to-explain-why-it-ignored-scientific-evidence-showing-harm-from-wireless-radiation/\n\n \n\nBecause I am aware of the health risks, I have tried my best to create a safe healthy environment in my home.  We do not have WIFI in our home and haven't for years.  Instead we use hard-wired internet.  We kindly ask anyone entering our home to please turn off their Cellular Data, Bluetooth, and WIFI on their phones and tablets as my husband and I do the same when we are in our home.  Rarely do we need to use the internet on our phones but if we do, we do it quickly and away from our son and then once we are done, we make sure to turn it back off, immediately. We have asked our neighbors to apply faraday cages on their utility meters and they gladly obliged.  We take all these measures, and I could go on listing more, because we are aware of the dangers. We do the best we can, to control what we can, knowing once we leave our house, it's a battle zone of cell towers and cell phones.  I ask that HHS do everything in its power to better protect Americans from increasing sources of “electrosmog.”\n\n","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4552","tags":["cancer-tumors","biology-metabolism","exposure-places","policy-standards","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"d03041cd3cea04aeea74baf9379981df75c5262e3e1eeb2812002ed3bbf7ddaf","slug":"cancer-tumors-comment-4552","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4552","body_sha256":"9537b8f6ace09f50e2008f510e4e1264270f9b8f8a47ff48ce1f71f67b2b3f35","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"smart-meters","topics":[{"id":"smart-meters","evidence":"it a comment.  I absolutely oppose the 2-way wireless radiation emitting smart meters and digital meters that have been forced on Americans’ homes, in"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"was sued in 2021 for failing to update their safety guidelines for human exposure limits that were established in 1996 when we "},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"ers radiating our homes 24/7.  This includes DNA damage, infertility and reproductive damage, cardiac effects and arrest"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"g our homes 24/7.  This includes DNA damage, infertility and reproductive damage, cardiac effects and arrest, neurological conditions (anxiety, d"},{"id":"cardiac","evidence":"damage, infertility and reproductive damage, cardiac effects and arrest, neurological conditions (anxiety, depression, Alzheimers), immu"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":"oductive damage, cardiac effects and arrest, neurological conditions (anxiety, depression, Alzheimers), immune system dysfunction, an"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":" Alzheimers), immune system dysfunction, and cancer.\n\n \n\nEnvironmental Health Trust provides a list of scientific ev"},{"id":"optical","evidence":" home and haven't for years.  Instead we use hard-wired internet.  We kindly ask anyone entering our home to please turn off thei"},{"id":"children","evidence":"ur phones but if we do, we do it quickly and away from our son and then once we are done, we make sure to turn it back off, imm"}],"summary":"Opposes compulsory wireless smart meters, cites concerns across several biological and health outcomes, questions FCC limits, and describes wired household practices to protect a child.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-26T22:22:05Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"9d17c637d0842478ad8dbbdec84f147df506b129ac6557f8878e981d69253fec","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["smart-meters","standards","mechanisms","reproductive","cardiac","neurological","cancer","optical","children"],"primary_topic":"smart-meters","forum_title":"Opposes compulsory wireless smart meters, cites concerns across several biological and health outcomes, q…"}