{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-4141","body_sha256":"0ec2fdac825794b9b28ffd97bb98e3e93defc10009f2710a7134b994657de3eb","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"section-704","topics":[{"id":"section-704","evidence":"know about the Clinton administration's 1992 Telecommunication Act. Prior to it being passed, telecommunication companies were proh"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"communication companies were prohibited from building cell towers within close proximity of schools, hospitals, medical clinics, day care and senior care"},{"id":"children","evidence":"ilding cell towers within close proximity of schools, hospitals, medical clinics, day care and senior care centers. Why? Because strong Wi Fi (RF radiation) is not healthy. It is "},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"man bodies perceive it as a foreign body and our immune system responds. Eventually our immune system fatigues and our bodies inflammato"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"ammatory response leads to disfunctions like diabetes and cancers. The passing of the 1992 Telecommunication Act rescinded that pr"},{"id":"standards","evidence":" have the clarity, courage and wisdom to put reasonable safeguards in place.\n\nThank you for taking an active role in examining the "},{"id":"research","evidence":"ncers are indisputable. There are volumes of reliable independent research on the damaging effects of RF radiation. If we do not have our g"}],"summary":"The commenter argues that telecommunications legislation weakened siting protections, proposes immune and inflammatory pathways of harm, and asks for safeguards and independent research focused on vulnerable groups.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-22T20:03:42Z","review_method":"Complete submitted comment-text review with neutral attributed summaries and exact evidence; attachments and external materials not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"63c96f415f652b760b368e1b22d5b6189b8e10bc0145e3c452b5820acc780420","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}