{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3917","body_sha256":"8d2214376caf46ea3f77f0b8de5d144ab83adb1b6c1029cd5b726dd8d709022a","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"r HHS\n\n  I am writing you that you conduct a full review of Cellular Tower Radiation.  My plea includes the visible spectrum as well.\n  It cannot be "},{"id":"section-704","evidence":"nderstated that such a study be undertaken.  The Telecommunucations Act is preposterous in excluding health and environmental concerns i"},{"id":"children","evidence":"line but now with the cellular proliferation children today are the ones at risk for long term exposure.  Is that not obviou"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"on.  There have also been studies indicating disruption to wildlife in multiple ways.\n  I fear that even we are affected living in a"},{"id":"optical","evidence":"nefit of Americas first minted trillionaire!\nFiber optic cable is the best choice.  It is cheap, already widespread and can be cheaply  installed "},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":"n, or PFases.\n  I also take exception to the Strobing lights required on cell towers which exceed 200’.  All are such eyesores to our landscape and o"}],"summary":"The commenter requests review of tower radiation and lighting, challenges restrictions on health-based siting decisions, raises long-term and wildlife concerns, and favors fiber infrastructure.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-21T23:43:28Z","review_method":"Complete submitted comment-text review with neutral attributed summaries and exact evidence; attachments and external materials not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"3680fc34a4a0a1f6497eff39ab423e907b1dad6bfdd5893cb38f08ccbd772e61","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}