{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3779","number":"3779","name":"Jill Zastresek","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-21T04:00Z","received":"2026-10-14T04:00Z","body":"I am submitting this comment in response to HHS’s Request for Information on Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs), Radiofrequency (RF) Radiation, and Wireless Radiation Exposure.\nNOW COME ON, WHY SUCH A WEIRD SHORT BOX TO TYPE IN??\nAnd...if these fields were good, why do cell tower companies keep any public comment about anything BUT health?  You can only fight them with OTHER comments, even though there is tons and tons of evidence...just plot cancer cases x cell tower locations!\n\nI support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential health and environmental effects of wireless radiation. Questions about human health should be addressed by federal agencies with appropriate expertise in medicine, biology, epidemiology, and public health, and the experiences of individuals and families who report being affected should be considered alongside the scientific evidence.\nI urge HHS to carefully evaluate these experiences and the scientific evidence, identify gaps in current research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health\n\nSure i support studying all this, bla bla...but c'mon YOU KNOW IT'S BAD.  i dare you to go live under a cell tower if you want to argue about it!\nso DO SOMETHING.\nsincerely, a hard working taxpayer!\n","attachments":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.regulations.gov/comment/HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3779","tags":["cancer-tumors","child-development","exposure-places","research-evidence"],"source_hash":"861f0996bc29063a818983dfc59a02cd74d2199d20d488aeaad844ef5084358b","slug":"cancer-tumors-comment-3779","classification":{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-3779","body_sha256":"a4200b93698098e183ab3864c9be2261b848df6186e65ccfd6794242ea8d5639","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"infrastructure","topics":[{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":" tons of evidence...just plot cancer cases x cell tower locations!\n\nI support HHS taking an active role in examining the potential"},{"id":"standards","evidence":" comment about anything BUT health?  You can only fight them with OTHER comments, even though there is tons and tons of evidence...just plot canc"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"gh there is tons and tons of evidence...just plot cancer cases x cell tower locations!\n\nI support HHS taking an active role in "},{"id":"research","evidence":"ther potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding wireless radiation and public health\n\nSure i support s"},{"id":"children","evidence":"rrent research, give particular attention to children and other potentially vulnerable populations, and establish appropriate federal research priorities regarding"}],"summary":"The commenter objects to restrictions on raising health concerns about towers, suggests comparing cancer patterns with tower locations, and urges HHS investigation and action.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-21T23:43:28Z","review_method":"Complete submitted comment-text review with neutral attributed summaries and exact evidence; attachments and external materials not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"771de1cc3c66ac2dd4c40e69783fc648024b9c1cf13673c8df458b4a7eeec880","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"},"forum_topics":["infrastructure","standards","cancer","research","children"],"primary_topic":"infrastructure","forum_title":"The commenter objects to restrictions on raising health concerns about towers, suggests comparing cancer …"}