{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-2898","body_sha256":"95e8185f4c46599b4d1bc3f60f0b383c5c512895ceb3832b7a33c81b639fa5f9","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"Q18: I request (1) a time-bound, public reassessment of RF limits and their treatment of long-term, multi-source exposure; (2"},{"id":"research","evidence":".\n\nQ16–17: NIH should fund independent, preregistered long-term epidemiology, developmental research, animal repl"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"ange.\n\nQ14–15: Fund rigorous studies of pollinators, birds, plants, and livestock, controlling for pesticides, "},{"id":"children","evidence":"ng, real-world exposures, including for children and ecosystems.\n\nQ3–4: Sources of concern include cell towe"},{"id":"occupational","evidence":"hildren, pregnant people, older adults, workers near transmitters, people with implanted medical devices (including interfere"},{"id":"ehs","evidence":"ptoms reported by people identifying as electromagnetically hypersensitive without presuming an RF cause.\n\nQ12–13: Investigate reprodu"},{"id":"optical","evidence":" independent of industry; (5) practical wired options and clear device settings for consumers; and (6) a transpar"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"ivacy-protective surveillance combining cancer registries, occupational and environmental monitoring, longitudinal co"}],"summary":"Requests a transparent reassessment of long-term, multi-source exposure limits, independent monitoring and research, ecological studies, privacy-protective reporting and wired alternatives, while emphasizing uncertainty and avoiding causal assumptions.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-15T03:51:16Z","review_method":"Source-based AI review of complete published comment bodies; exact topic evidence; attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"6320d60a2aa22d221a22ab91d76eede2c576b7137d3dfa8cac5772bafc141fd6","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}