{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-1006","body_sha256":"861dc656941f93c335bc45e1053bfee1ece61db222fd15887cf5dac43a0393f2","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"e aware of the true EMF risks and refuse coverage to the wireless industry.\nThe FCC is considered to be a captured agency by Harvard ethicists with prior commissioners having strong t"},{"id":"research","evidence":"No safety studies have been done on 5G and cell phone science has many parallels to tobacco science. Studies paid for"},{"id":"environment","evidence":"fety concerns. The FDA and EPA which could have a role in regulating health and environmental impacts are also captured. EMF hazards also cause harm to trees, birds, bees, and other insects.\n"}],"summary":"Criticizes existing exposure standards, industry influence and the response to the FCC court remand. Requests independent research and updated protections and raises environmental concerns.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-28T16:09:15Z","review_method":"Source-matched AI review of 101 new complete comment bodies with exact supporting passages; three attachment-dependent covering notes remain pending. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"b1da4356284b6773f7fe9157e5fd2fb091fb4758af553924b5274f43f537bcde","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}