{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0938","body_sha256":"67ef8c9f772e8cd08b8985b0b51b224df518e6cc114e0e212a1bc7ef40149472","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"standards","topics":[{"id":"standards","evidence":"ve the federal government has waited far too long to conduct a thorough, modern reassessment of radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure standards and their ability to protect the public.\n\nThe FCC adopted its RF "},{"id":"research","evidence":"g HHS, the FCC, NIH, FDA, CDC, NIEHS, and other appropriate agencies to support rigorous, independent research into cumulative RF exposure, multiple simultaneous RF sources, lifelong exposure beginning in child"},{"id":"children","evidence":" day.\n\nI am especially concerned about infrastructure located near places where children, older adults, and other potentially vulnerable populations spend significant amounts of time. This"},{"id":"infrastructure","evidence":" in today.\n\nPeople are not exposed to one RF source at a time. We may encounter cell towers and antennas, WiFi routers, cell phones, tablets, Bluetooth devices, smart devices, security system"},{"id":"wifi","evidence":" exposed to one RF source at a time. We may encounter cell towers and antennas, WiFi routers, cell phones, tablets, Bluetooth devices, smart devices, security systems, and other wireless techn"},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"s, reproductive and developmental effects, neurological and biological effects, cancer outcomes, occupational exposure, and current and emerging wireless technologies.\n\nFederal agencies should al"},{"id":"reproductive","evidence":"s, lifelong exposure beginning in childhood, potentially sensitive populations, reproductive and developmental effects, neurological and biological effects, cancer outcomes, occupational exposure, and current a"},{"id":"neurological","evidence":"ood, potentially sensitive populations, reproductive and developmental effects, neurological and biological effects, cancer outcomes, occupational exposure, and current and emerging wireless t"},{"id":"occupational","evidence":". Older adults, people with implanted medical devices, workers with substantial occupational exposure, and people with existing health conditions also deserve appropriate consideration.\n\nTechnology con"},{"id":"cardiac","evidence":"ireless RF exposure for virtually their entire lives. Older adults, people with implanted medical devices, workers with substantial occupational exposure, and people with existing health conditions also de"}],"summary":"Requests a modern, independent reassessment of RF limits and cumulative, lifelong and multi-source exposure. Discusses animal findings alongside human null results, explicitly asks agencies not to presume an outcome, and prioritizes children, older adults, workers and implanted-device users.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-26T18:38:52Z","review_method":"Source-matched AI review of all 36 new complete comment bodies with exact supporting passages. Attachments and external links not reviewed.","review_source_sha256":"34ef7980819fccd005083f7f8b8681ed13cb9aa3774723e22e3d91827d2ff91a","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}