{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-0182","body_sha256":"a068c5a4e822f6b4890b2d39aae6811b4b0c3011fe2156db7b6a01f6386e1441","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"cancer","topics":[{"id":"cancer","evidence":"\t•\tIn 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the World Health Organization, classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as a Group 2B \"possible human carcinogen\" — the same category as lead and DDT — bas"},{"id":"research","evidence":"To the Department of Health and Human Services:\n\nI am submitting this comment in response to the RFI on EMF/RF radiation and wireless exposure (FR Doc. 2026-19252). My perspective is that of an individual and a healthcare indu"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"te the state of the science on RF/EMF exposure, including at levels below current federal limits, and I urge the Department to weigh the following evidence as it identifies research priorities:\n\n\t•\tIn 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), part of the W"},{"id":"children","evidence":"\t•\tPrioritize research on cumulative, long-term, non-thermal exposure, particularly for children and other potentially sensitive populations;\n\t•\tCommission an independent re-evaluation of whether current exposure standards adequately reflect the NTP and Ramazzini findings;\n\t•"}],"summary":"The commenter cites animal research and carcinogenicity assessments, acknowledges uncertainties in human relevance and requests independent reassessment and practical guidance.","reviewed_at":"2026-09-22T01:54:07Z","review_method":"AI source-text review; explicit topic passages; 2026-09-22","review_source_sha256":"ddc7d754d371fa51b2743f611e0946b4ac0356d33009c6d335c04f5e068e9deb","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}