{"id":"HHS-OASH-2026-0397-5882","body_sha256":"327b38eaf92421214e8e00dc392e8a4f2b602f1f1a0fb70cb9f05cf6072b4c6d","status":"ai_reviewed","primary_topic":"research","topics":[{"id":"research","evidence":"smart meters, WiFi, and the like. We welcome HHS examining these technologies with greater detail, particularly focusing on the ill -or possib"},{"id":"mechanisms","evidence":"\n\"What escaped the attention of many is that life's metabolism and design make it much more vulnerable to NTER [non-thermal ele"},{"id":"standards","evidence":"Previous assessments of the health effects of EMF/RF have been based upon the assumpt"}],"summary":"The commenter challenges assumptions about nonthermal safety, cites a paper discussing biological vulnerability to unprecedented wireless exposure, and supports research on harmful or beneficial effects of frequency ranges.","reviewed_at":"2026-10-28T16:50:58Z","review_method":"Full comment-text review with exact source evidence; attachments not reviewed","review_source_sha256":"7480c7c8a9e96c2fd549e6422014e3db71e3c03ac8dacbb105ece9c8b4d8306c","source_url":"https://rfsafe.net/hhs-comments/data/catalog.json","scope":"Original comment body; attachments excluded"}