{"id":"26110081815","body_sha256":"b32923a64554428a1fc721c9f1a04f49076dc9122093a288514cb2d80f8c3c62","status":"text_matched","primary_topic":"health-experiences","topics":[{"id":"health-experiences","evidence":"13-84 regulatory proceeding titled \"Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency (RF) Exposure Limits and Policies.\" I am responding from several perspectives: as a software engineer with extensive experience working with technology and electronic systems; as a person who has experienced significant symptoms that I associate with exposure to electromagnetic fields and wireless radiation; and as a professional who has spent the past several years measuring and documenting electromagnetic field exposures in my home and other environments."},{"id":"sleep-neurology","evidence":"I also believe that federal research priorities should include long-term, independent investigation of cumulative and chronic exposure, children and pregnancy, reproductive and developmental outcomes, neurological and sleep-related effects, cardiovascular and other biological effects, environmental and ecological effects, and exposure associated with evolving technologies such as 5G, future wireless systems, IoT devices, wearables, smart homes, wireless medical devices, and increasingly dense wireless infrastructure."},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"The National Toxicology Program conducted extensive, government-sponsored toxicology and carcinogenicity studies using whole-body exposure to 900 MHz GSM- and CDMA-modulated radiofrequency radiation."},{"id":"children-schools","evidence":"the type, number, frequencies and transmission characteristics of a device; how to reduce unnecessary close-proximity exposure; how to use wired alternatives where available; how to disable wireless functions completely; whether a device continues transmitting while in standby or charging; whether simultaneous transmitters were evaluated; whether children or other populations were specifically evaluated; and what exposure conditions were and were not included in testing."},{"id":"pregnancy-reproduction","evidence":"I am particularly concerned about exposure involving children, infants, pregnancy, and other populations that may differ from those of a typical adult."},{"id":"biology-metabolism","evidence":"found that 50 minutes of cellular-phone RF exposure was associated with increased glucose metabolism in brain regions closest to the phone antenna."},{"id":"towers-antennas","evidence":"I also believe that federal research priorities should include long-term, independent investigation of cumulative and chronic exposure, children and pregnancy, reproductive and developmental outcomes, neurological and sleep-related effects, cardiovascular and other biological effects, environmental and ecological effects, and exposure associated with evolving technologies such as 5G, future wireless systems, IoT devices, wearables, smart homes, wireless medical devices, and increasingly dense wireless infrastructure."},{"id":"wifi-devices","evidence":"I don’t want to feel these symptoms anymore when doing normal things like working in an office, walking into a store with an overpowered mesh / wifi system, going to a concert, restaurant, bar, or visiting family or friends."},{"id":"wired-alternatives","evidence":"Cellular phones should support calls and text messaging when the phone is connected through a wired Ethernet connection to a router, so that consumers who choose a wired network connection can use their phones for these functions without requiring an active wireless connection."},{"id":"wildlife-environment","evidence":"In January of 2022 I eliminated wireless technologies completely from my personal environment and whenever feasible reduced or distanced myself from electric and magnetic emissions."},{"id":"standards-testing","evidence":"13-84 regulatory proceeding titled \"Reassessment of Federal Communications Commission Radiofrequency (RF) Exposure Limits and Policies.\" I am responding from several perspectives: as a software engineer with extensive experience working with technology and electronic systems; as a person who has experienced significant symptoms that I associate with exposure to electromagnetic fields and wireless radiation; and as a professional who has spent the past several years measuring and documenting electromagnetic field exposures in my home and other environments."},{"id":"remand-accountability","evidence":"Morgan et al., Why children absorb more microwave radiation than adults: The consequences These studies are particularly relevant to the FCC's remand questions concerning children because a standard based on a reference adult or a generalized SAR measurement may not necessarily characterize exposure for all body sizes, ages, anatomical structures, or use conditions."},{"id":"research-requests","evidence":"Technology will continue to develop faster than long-term health research and regulatory processes can reasonably keep pace with it."}],"summary":"","method":"Local topic rules v1; exact supporting passages; not an AI or medical review","scope":"Captured filing text only. Attachment contents not examined."}