{"id":"26110077107","number":"26110077107","name":"Courtney Harris","source_name":"Courtney Harris","organization":"","posted":"2026-09-21","received":"2026-09-21","body":"I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines. The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment. The FCC is not a health agency and does not have expertise in medicine, biology or public health. Yet, the agency continues to assert authority over RF exposure standards and is preparing to reach conclusions about whether its existing guidelines adequately protect the public. I urge the FCC to recognize the critical role of federal health agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and to rely on appropriate health and biological expertise when addressing the issues identified by the court. This issue matters to me personally because my family and I live 50 yards from a large 5G tower that hovers above a track and field and a playground. I can see the tower from my front yard and my family and I have experienced frequent headaches, brain fog and sleep disturbances. There are two children in our area who have been diagnosed with leukemia and it is difficult to not assume the 5G tower could have had some impact. We live in a densely populated neighborhood where many families are impacted by the use of this large tower. In addition to the tower, AT&T and Verizon have placed at least Four 5G \"boosters\" within a 100 yard radius of my home. They are in our alleyways and along our sidewalks. My Broadband RF meter detects levels far above \"safe\" at extreme levels (87,000 µW/m²). My children are exposed to this around the clock while at home. Would you feel comfortable with your family in this environment?","attachments":[],"attachment_names":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110077107","filing_type":"COMMENT","proceedings":"ET 13-84","capture_reviewed":true,"captured_at":"2026-09-29T10:34:57.034Z","supplied_classification":null,"tags":["health-experiences","sleep-neurology","cancer","children-schools","towers-antennas","wildlife-environment","standards-testing","remand-accountability","research-requests"],"source_hash":"d84e60dc8ede99f57a39bb617c8281b8655596ac8115a9449fd491da5f708758","slug":"health-experiences-filing-26110077107","classification":{"id":"26110077107","body_sha256":"3d15c28a8603af2b39952a5fbc01dfd26552ab4c72dc85b2d4295e450bc849dc","status":"text_matched","primary_topic":"health-experiences","topics":[{"id":"health-experiences","evidence":"I can see the tower from my front yard and my family and I have experienced frequent headaches, brain fog and sleep disturbances."},{"id":"sleep-neurology","evidence":"I can see the tower from my front yard and my family and I have experienced frequent headaches, brain fog and sleep disturbances."},{"id":"cancer","evidence":"The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment."},{"id":"children-schools","evidence":"The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment."},{"id":"towers-antennas","evidence":"This issue matters to me personally because my family and I live 50 yards from a large 5G tower that hovers above a track and field and a playground."},{"id":"wildlife-environment","evidence":"The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment."},{"id":"standards-testing","evidence":"Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines."},{"id":"remand-accountability","evidence":"Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its decades-old radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure guidelines."},{"id":"research-requests","evidence":"The FCC should fully consider evidence and real-world experiences concerning the health and environmental impacts of wireless radiation, including non-cancer health effects, impacts on children, long-term and cumulative exposure, cancer, and impacts on wildlife and the environment."}],"summary":"","method":"Local topic rules v1; exact supporting passages; not an AI or medical review","scope":"Captured filing text only. Attachment contents not examined."},"forum_topics":["health-experiences","sleep-neurology","cancer","children-schools","towers-antennas","wildlife-environment","standards-testing","remand-accountability","research-requests"],"primary_topic":"health-experiences","forum_title":"I am writing regarding the FCC’s response to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ remand concerning its dec…"}