{"id":"26110080128","body_sha256":"16212d835d72e31afe3091ab100eb1b50506148c507937d0d3cf9ba530d3fb34","status":"text_matched","primary_topic":"disability-access","topics":[{"id":"disability-access","evidence":"The public should not have to sacrifice access to their homes in order to accommodate an expanding wireless infrastructure."},{"id":"towers-antennas","evidence":"In my case, that regulatory framework resulted in a 5G small cell installation being placed on the swale adjacent to my property, 32 feet from my bedroom window."},{"id":"wildlife-environment","evidence":"Families are living in close proximity to increasingly ubiquitous wireless infrastructure, and existing regulations must account for the realities of that environment."},{"id":"standards-testing","evidence":"As you are fully aware, the current RF exposure guidelines date back to 1996."},{"id":"remand-accountability","evidence":"Unless you are actively tracking the court transcripts of current lawsuits against this agency, you will not know about this bracket number."},{"id":"research-requests","evidence":"The FCC must comply with the law, meaningfully address the scientific evidence before it, and consider human consequences of its regulatory decisions."}],"summary":"","method":"Local topic rules v1; exact supporting passages; not an AI or medical review","scope":"Captured filing text only. Attachment contents not examined."}