{"id":"26110082512","body_sha256":"0946e8e138bc8a96c067609e2f08c38053ba239c98a62e64a025870d9ea92f50","status":"text_matched","primary_topic":"children-schools","topics":[{"id":"children-schools","evidence":"Protect children first."},{"id":"towers-antennas","evidence":"A spectrum regulator that promotes 5G and 6G should not grade its own safety homework."},{"id":"wifi-devices","evidence":"The 2019 finding that \"no changes are warranted\" ignores the court's concern about how wireless has changed since then: near-universal phones, dense small-cell networks, and constant exposure."},{"id":"wildlife-environment","evidence":"Interior said in 2014 that no independent field studies of towers and birds exist."},{"id":"standards-testing","evidence":"Set exposure limits with independent federal health agencies, and say so in your remand answer."},{"id":"remand-accountability","evidence":"13-84, RF Exposure Issues on Remand in Environmental Health Trust v."},{"id":"research-requests","evidence":"Companies, CEOs, and their lawyers come and go, and studies paid for by the interests being judged deserve the skepticism you reserve for us."}],"summary":"","method":"Local topic rules v1; exact supporting passages; not an AI or medical review","scope":"Captured filing text only. Attachment contents not examined."}