{"id":"26110083168","body_sha256":"f2b1f17d395d907fd8dc3931f7ad8c099350fc875a916bdefee49b7769de3825","status":"text_matched","primary_topic":"cancer","topics":[{"id":"cancer","evidence":"Not only does this deprive the community of an opportunity to voice opposition, but it also takes away freedom of choice for exposure to something that the American Cancer Society cannot definitively declare \"safe\" or that it does not cause cancer, due to lack of long term studies to substantiate that it does not cause cancer."},{"id":"children-schools","evidence":"13-84 — Reassessment of FCC Radiofrequency Exposure Limits and Policies I am submitting this comment as a concerned resident and parent regarding the serious imbalance between federal telecommunications policy, public health protections, and the rights of local communities to determine whether wireless telecommunications infrastructure should be constructed near their homes and schools."},{"id":"biology-metabolism","evidence":"I personally have a BRCA mutation and I am more susceptible to DNA damage from RF."},{"id":"towers-antennas","evidence":"Residents may express concerns about long-term RF exposure, proximity to children, cumulative exposure from multiple installations, or the adequacy of existing safety standards, yet their elected local officials are severely restricted in their ability to consider those concerns when deciding whether to approve a tower."},{"id":"standards-testing","evidence":"13-84 — Reassessment of FCC Radiofrequency Exposure Limits and Policies I am submitting this comment as a concerned resident and parent regarding the serious imbalance between federal telecommunications policy, public health protections, and the rights of local communities to determine whether wireless telecommunications infrastructure should be constructed near their homes and schools."},{"id":"remand-accountability","evidence":"The Telecommunications Act of 1996 fundamentally altered the ability of local governments to protect their communities from unwanted wireless infrastructure."},{"id":"research-requests","evidence":"Residents may express concerns about long-term RF exposure, proximity to children, cumulative exposure from multiple installations, or the adequacy of existing safety standards, yet their elected local officials are severely restricted in their ability to consider those concerns when deciding whether to approve a tower."}],"summary":"","method":"Local topic rules v1; exact supporting passages; not an AI or medical review","scope":"Captured filing text only. Attachment contents not examined."}