{"id":"26110083075","body_sha256":"9c8bd43a71938a261f738e8886874de226c5e83aa24e4506620ea79589c008a1","status":"text_matched","primary_topic":"cancer","topics":[{"id":"cancer","evidence":"Exposure limits to radiofrequency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental animals."},{"id":"pregnancy-reproduction","evidence":"Exposure limits to radiofrequency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental animals."},{"id":"towers-antennas","evidence":"Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: Implications for 5G."},{"id":"standards-testing","evidence":"Exposure limits to radiofrequency EMF do not account for cancer risk or reproductive toxicity assessed from data in experimental animals."},{"id":"research-requests","evidence":"There is not adequate research done for us to proceed."}],"summary":"","method":"Local topic rules v1; exact supporting passages; not an AI or medical review","scope":"Captured filing text only. Attachment contents not examined."}