{"id":"26110079244","number":"26110079244","name":"Douglas Miller","source_name":"Douglas Miller","organization":"","posted":"2026-10-05","received":"2026-10-05","body":"Is the FCC actually protecting public health? In a 2021 the U.S. court of appeals ruled that the FCC's decision was arbitrary and capricious, finding it failed to show proper review in regards to numerous issues related to public health and the environment. The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts. If it is indeed true that this is a complex issue and that the FCC needs more time, then why hasn't the FCC stopped the roll out of wireless technology given that it is clear that it is harmful to our biology and mental health? I am citing a study, one of thousands, to remind the FCC that you are an organization that was created to protect human health, and to regulate, not stand by while humans remain vulnerable and negatively affected by the proliferation of wireless technology that invades my personal, professional and social existence. Rao VS, Titushkin IA, Moros EG, Pickard WF, Thatte HS, Cho MR. Nonthermal effects of radiofrequency-field exposure on calcium dynamics in stem cell-derived neuronal cells: elucidation of calcium pathways. Radiat Res. 2008 Mar;169(3):319-29. doi: 10.1667/RR1118.1. PMID: 18302487.","attachments":[],"attachment_names":[],"attachment_inventory":true,"withheld":false,"source":"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/26110079244","filing_type":"COMMENT","proceedings":"ET 13-84","capture_reviewed":false,"captured_at":"2026-10-05T20:14:31.327Z","supplied_classification":null,"tags":["cancer","children-schools","pregnancy-reproduction","wildlife-environment","standards-testing","remand-accountability","research-requests"],"source_hash":"69511ecc94f5cbfe62152b32f712d911a1010b92107d25f89116646fc6c62911","slug":"cancer-filing-26110079244","classification":{"id":"26110079244","body_sha256":"362f8ec8ff3bf61945f4cc31d3d5a4da8eaef0cc82ae9360ba51d63499332b89","status":"text_matched","primary_topic":"cancer","topics":[{"id":"cancer","evidence":"The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts."},{"id":"children-schools","evidence":"The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts."},{"id":"pregnancy-reproduction","evidence":"The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts."},{"id":"wildlife-environment","evidence":"court of appeals ruled that the FCC's decision was arbitrary and capricious, finding it failed to show proper review in regards to numerous issues related to public health and the environment."},{"id":"standards-testing","evidence":"Nonthermal effects of radiofrequency-field exposure on calcium dynamics in stem cell-derived neuronal cells: elucidation of calcium pathways."},{"id":"remand-accountability","evidence":"In a 2021 the U.S."},{"id":"research-requests","evidence":"The court issued a mandate that the FCC show proper examination of evidence on its record related to non-cancer health effects (such as impacts to reproduction, brain development and the immune system), long-term exposure, children’s vulnerability, and environmental impacts."}],"summary":"","method":"Local topic rules v1; exact supporting passages; not an AI or medical review","scope":"Captured filing text only. Attachment contents not examined."},"forum_topics":["cancer","children-schools","pregnancy-reproduction","wildlife-environment","standards-testing","remand-accountability","research-requests"],"primary_topic":"cancer","forum_title":"Is the FCC actually protecting public health? In a 2021 the U.S. court of appeals ruled that the FCC's de…"}